bonus

Stacking Managed Futures with RSST and RSBT

In this episode, Rodrigo Gordillo, President of ReSolve Asset Management and Co-Founder of Return Stacked ETFs, delves into the history, mechanics, and benefits of managed futures strategies. Gordillo recounts the evolution from the original turtle traders to modern systematic approaches in trend following. He explains the behavioral finance underpinnings that make these strategies effective, including concepts like anchoring and cascading effects. The conversation covers the diversification benefits of managed futures, their non-correlation with traditional asset classes, and their performance in different market regimes. Gordillo also introduces return stacking and portable alpha concepts, illustrating how these methods can provide both diversification and potential outperformance without significantly increasing portfolio risk. The discussion includes practical examples and the mechanics behind ETFs like RSST and RSBT.

00:00 Introduction to Managed Futures

01:24 Understanding Trend Following

03:11 Behavioral Finance and Trend Following

04:12 Benefits of Investing in Managed Futures

07:46 Challenges of Diversification

10:30 Return Stacking Explained

13:19 Mechanics of RSST and RSBT

21:06 Practical Use Cases for Return Stacking

23:45 Conclusion and Further Learning

Definition of terms used:

S&P 500: A market-capitalization-weighted index that tracks the performance of approximately 500 leading U.S. publicly traded companies, widely used as a benchmark for the overall U.S. equity market.

Investors should consider the investment objectives, risks, charges, and expenses carefully before investing. For a prospectus or summary prospectus with this and other information about the Fund, please click here (https://www.returnstackedetfs.com/rsst-return-stacked-us-stocks-managed-futures/) Read the prospectus or summary prospectus carefully before investing.

Investments involve risk. Principal loss is possible. Unlike mutual funds, ETFs may trade at a premium or discount to their net asset value. Brokerage commissions may apply and would reduce returns. Toroso Investments, LLC (“Toroso”) serves as investment adviser to the Funds and the Funds’ Subsidiary. Newfound Research LLC (“Newfound”) serves as investment sub-adviser to the Funds. ReSolve Asset Management SEZC (Cayman) (“ReSolve”) serves as futures trading advisor to the Fund and the Funds’ Subsidiary. Foreside Fund Services, LLC is the distributor for the Funds. Foreside is not related to Toroso, Newfound, or ReSolve.

Transcript
Interviewer:

Stacking Managed Futures with RSST and RSBT with Rodrigo Gordillo,

2

:

president, resolve Asset Management

and Co-Founder Return Stacked ETFs.

3

:

What are managed future strategies?

4

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: It is a

strategy as old as modern finance.

5

:

Uh, if you think about the original turtle

traders and the market wizards, I'm sure a

6

:

lot of people in your audience have heard

of those, um, kind of individuals that.

7

:

That were legends in the trading world.

8

:

They were the original trend

following managed futures guys, right?

9

:

They were, they were looking at

charts, seeing if there were going

10

:

up and they were trading equities.

11

:

They were trading global bonds,

commodities, currencies, and identifying

12

:

upper trends and buying them.

13

:

And then looking at the charts and,

you know, manually clicking those

14

:

orders when they go and start losing

money, they start shorting 'em.

15

:

And, uh, that's how trend following

began from a fundamental perspective.

16

:

And then over the years, and that's,

that's back in the eighties, right?

17

:

But over the years, it evolved

into more systematic approaches

18

:

where you're, you know.

19

:

And very, very disciplined about

how you are executing those trades.

20

:

No longer gut based, but

more systematically based,

21

:

repetitive and consistent.

22

:

So that is what trend following

is, is there's something that has

23

:

recently gone up and is likely to

continue to go up for a period.

24

:

And something that has recently

gone down is likely to continue

25

:

to go down for a period.

26

:

And, uh, we see this.

27

:

Play out in, in stocks, in individual

stocks, even in asset classes.

28

:

And all these, uh, asset classes

that I just walked you through,

29

:

it tends to play out over time.

30

:

Um, and so why is it that this.

31

:

Phenomenon works.

32

:

Why isn't it been our about?

33

:

Um, and I think the answer to

that has been, uh, answered by

34

:

Amos Dki and Danny Kahneman.

35

:

Um, sadly Kahneman recently passed

away, but he was at the forefront of

36

:

this with, uh, behavioral finance.

37

:

Talking about concepts like anchoring

and adjusting where information comes

38

:

out and people anchor to, to the

information, but not fully adjust to

39

:

the new information, just a little bit.

40

:

So there's time for us to identify

that people are anchoring upward.

41

:

You can place your bets in and then you

can benefit from the adjustment that

42

:

inevitably goes down, or cascade effects,

which is the same idea of like cascading

43

:

information, taking a while to dissipate.

44

:

So those are the behavior angles.

45

:

There's also some risk reasons why

it continues to work, but broadly

46

:

speaking, I think that if, um, if

you're gonna see, the reason you see

47

:

this working is because human beings

are, continue to be human beings and

48

:

we tend to have hurting behavior.

49

:

And, um, and it, it's, it's

never really gone away.

50

:

Interviewer: What is the benefit

of investing in managed futures?

51

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: The first thing

is, if you ever do invest in managed

52

:

futures, you will allocate to them.

53

:

You'll likely have that position

or that that, um, fund or ETF be

54

:

the most diversified thing you

have in your portfolio, right?

55

:

Like most 60 40 portfolios

are exactly that 60%.

56

:

Bunch of equities, mostly domestic.

57

:

'cause we have domestic home country

bias, some international, and the

58

:

bonds are generally very domestic.

59

:

So it's very, very domestically driven.

60

:

Two asset classes and

not much more than that.

61

:

When you look and you x-ray into the

options for managed futures, trend

62

:

followers to select asset classes, we're

looking at dozens and dozens of markets

63

:

across those major categories, right?

64

:

Equities, bonds,

commodities, and currencies.

65

:

So first and first and

foremost, diversification.

66

:

Secondly, I.

67

:

The golden rule behind asset allocation

and portfolio construction is you wanna

68

:

find as many things that have an upward

sloping equity line so that you expect

69

:

to make positive returns over time, but

move differently from each other, right?

70

:

We've seen that firsthand between

bonds and equities from:

71

:

all the way to nine to 2020.

72

:

Some of those correlations have

broken down, and we've always

73

:

known that they would when there

was an inflationary regime, but.

74

:

We see the value of that diversification.

75

:

The question is, you know, where else

can we find true non-correlation?

76

:

And when you look at the hedge fund space,

when you look at all the categories from

77

:

long, short equity to market, neutral to

merger arbitrage, to you know, the private

78

:

credit, private equity, the two categories

that stand out as being legitimately.

79

:

Consistently zero correlation

over a prolonged period of time.

80

:

And the ability to have really strong

negative correlations at the right

81

:

time happens to be managed future

trend and and systematic macro.

82

:

And the reason for that is because they're

not market neutral, they are directional.

83

:

If the trends are up and we're

in a big equity bull market, then

84

:

there's gonna be more returns coming

from the equities that we are long

85

:

in that trend following strategy.

86

:

But if, God forbid there were to

be a bear market, um, guess what?

87

:

The benefit of being able to

short equities, short commodities,

88

:

go long treasuries in oh eight.

89

:

Was where all the magic happened, right?

90

:

It just happens to be a unique asset class

that has historically provided double

91

:

digit returns when you meet 'em the most.

92

:

Uh, and then when it's the, the other

interesting thing about trend following is

93

:

that it doesn't try to predict the future.

94

:

It's a reactive function.

95

:

Something's happening.

96

:

We are going to iterate based

on what's happening today.

97

:

And so it didn't need to predict.

98

:

Um, that in an inflationary regime like

:

99

:

the best game in town, and that you

wanted to short both equities and bonds.

100

:

It wasn't looking back at oh eight

and saying, Hey, bonds were good.

101

:

Commodities and equities were bad.

102

:

We should do that now.

103

:

It just reacted.

104

:

And that's another, another great year

for just a broad indices of managed

105

:

futures of double digits, mainly from,

uh, commodities and then shorting bonds.

106

:

Right.

107

:

So it's just, it's.

108

:

It's got this great character of crisis

alpha and um, and non-correlation equities

109

:

and bonds, which is great obviously during

bear markets and inflationary regimes.

110

:

Now we can talk about when

is not so great, but, um, but

111

:

yeah, broadly speaking, that's

why people should want them.

112

:

Interviewer: Why aren't managed

futures as popular diversifiers you'd

113

:

imagine with everyday investors?

114

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: When you talk

to the average investor or advisor

115

:

and you talk about the broad

idea of diversification, um.

116

:

Why widely speaking people believe that

diversification is a good thing, right?

117

:

That's, that's generally

not, uh, questioned.

118

:

But the reality is that the lived

experience of those that decided to

119

:

diversify, and even if like we're talking

about global equity investing, right?

120

:

Those that are being thoughtful and

using their fiduciary responsibility

121

:

correctly have been burnt, or it's

been a bear market in diversification

122

:

as Meb favor puts in, right?

123

:

And so.

124

:

Reality is over the last decade when you

could have just invested in a very cheap,

125

:

simple index like the s and p 500, um.

126

:

You would've been better off.

127

:

And diversification to that decade

of investors felt, you know, I think

128

:

there's, there's synonymous with words

like sacrifice or, or compromise, right?

129

:

A trade-off between risk management

and, and the return potential, right?

130

:

We just don't think that, um, that

that's gonna be the case in the future.

131

:

And.

132

:

I think they're, they were correct.

133

:

Right?

134

:

If you are adding a 10, 20% allocation

managed futures in the last decade, you

135

:

had two things that needed to go right.

136

:

Number one, you need to deliver

diversification, and number two, you

137

:

needed to beat the s and p 500, right?

138

:

That's a really tough thing

to tall, tall order, right?

139

:

And so.

140

:

The, the last decade has been just a,

had a chilling effect to anything that

141

:

wa that wasn't the Mag seven really.

142

:

Let's, let's be honest, if we get down

to the nitty gritty of it, and, and

143

:

so it just, they just got out of favor

until:

144

:

Again, it made positive

returns during that decade.

145

:

There were just, there were just

low single digits in contrast

146

:

to 16% annualized during, you

know, right before the crash.

147

:

So.

148

:

It's, that's just really hard to do.

149

:

Institutions were fine because they never,

they don't necessarily use managed futures

150

:

to, like, they don't sell their equities

and bonds to buy these diversifiers, at

151

:

least the more sophisticated ones, right.

152

:

They use this concept of portable

alpha return stacking to stack

153

:

these diversifiers on top.

154

:

And, and that's really the, the big shift

in the last couple years in retail that

155

:

allows people to say, okay, you know,

maybe, maybe it isn't, diversification

156

:

isn't necessary evil anymore.

157

:

Maybe it's accretive.

158

:

Maybe it's now we have a

way to say yes and right.

159

:

Yes to my equities and

some diversification.

160

:

Whereas in the past, I think it was just.

161

:

Too risky to have a prolonged period

where you would underperform equities.

162

:

Interviewer: How does return

stacking or portable alpha solve the

163

:

traditional diversification dilemma?

164

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: You have a decade,

like the last decade where you know,

165

:

you're, you're waiting for the other

shoe to drop and it never drops.

166

:

And it never drops.

167

:

Right?

168

:

And you have these, let's

say, managed futures.

169

:

It was a period there where

it was annualizing at two 3%.

170

:

You, you've, you have, let's say you have

a hundred percent equity portfolio and in

171

:

2012, you, you sell 10% of your equities

to buy 10% of, of managed futures.

172

:

Fast forward a decade, the 90% did 16%.

173

:

The, the 10% that you allocated

to only analyze it too,

174

:

that's really tough, right?

175

:

But the way that return stacking works,

so the, the ETFs that that we run are

176

:

our SST return stacked US stocks and

trend manage managed future trend.

177

:

And return stacked bonds

and managed futures trend.

178

:

For every dollar that you give this, these

ETFs, you're gonna get a dollar of the

179

:

s and p and a dollar of managed futures.

180

:

So.

181

:

Instead of having to make room in

the portfolio back in, let's say

182

:

2012, you would've sold 10% to buy

something like RSST and that gives

183

:

you, you sold 10% of, of your stocks

and then you bought it right back.

184

:

With this one plus one fund you get, so

you're back at a hundred percent equity

185

:

and then you have the returns of a

managed future strategy stacked on top.

186

:

Um, now go through that period

where managed futures only did 2%.

187

:

Well, it's whatever.

188

:

That's because we're stacking it.

189

:

If the s and p did 16% annualized

this, this return stacked idea

190

:

would've done 16% annually plus an

extra two, you're actually, it's

191

:

actually 2% is a lot of money.

192

:

And then if you fast forward to

:

193

:

35% and then futures are up double

digits offsetting most of the,

194

:

most of the losses, if not more.

195

:

Then all of a sudden you're like, okay,

that's an easy way for me to bide my

196

:

time to allow diversification to work.

197

:

Right?

198

:

And of course, in between that decade,

there was one or two years where,

199

:

where managed futures was negative.

200

:

But, but again, from a behavioral

perspective, if you hold that one

201

:

plus one pre-package solution s

and P's up 20 and it s down four,

202

:

that prepackaged solution is up 16.

203

:

A few people will complain

about that, right?

204

:

It, it becomes a much

easier line item to hold.

205

:

And I think, you know, diversification

is always better when mixed in

206

:

with other things at Zig when

they zag behaviorally, right?

207

:

Much like how private equities become

really easy to hold because they

208

:

smooth out returns over 18 months.

209

:

It's still equities, but they just,

the packaging is easier to hold.

210

:

I think return stacked, uh, solutions

is also easier to hold and, and will

211

:

be a bit of a revolution going forward.

212

:

Interviewer: What are

the mechanics of RSST?

213

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: Let me walk

you through the simple mechanics.

214

:

Let's start with RSST.

215

:

When you x-ray the holdings, what

you'll find it is that you'll

216

:

have, we'll have bought 75% of

the vanguard, uh, US large cap.

217

:

Okay, so just, we're, we're actually

buying straight up another ETF that

218

:

has the tax advantages and so on.

219

:

25% is remains in cash.

220

:

We're gonna use that 25% as collateral.

221

:

To then top up the rest of the US

equity that we need by buying the s

222

:

and PE mini futures contract, right?

223

:

So we only have to, in reality,

put like three 4% margin down

224

:

to be able to get a full.

225

:

Exposure to the s and p.

226

:

So we have 75% in, in NETF, 25%

in an s and PE mini contract.

227

:

Now we have our full a hundred

percent exposure to the s and p 500.

228

:

Right?

229

:

That's step one.

230

:

That's how you get what you need.

231

:

That's how you give the

clients what they want.

232

:

Now, how we give them what they

need, which is a diversification.

233

:

Well, we still have $25 as of margin

that we could use to go long and short.

234

:

All of those different asset

classes that we talked about.

235

:

Uh, we really don't need 25%.

236

:

It's just a good buffer to have in case

there's, you know, margin requirements go

237

:

up and down over time when crisis goes.

238

:

Um, when we have moments of crisis

and we need more margin, 25 is

239

:

more than necessary for our needs.

240

:

Uh, but most of the time you're using 10%

margin, uh, in order to get full exposure

241

:

to a managed future trading strategy.

242

:

And, and then we trade that every day.

243

:

We rebalance that managed futures.

244

:

Strategy every day.

245

:

We trade it on an ongoing basis.

246

:

We keep the one-to-one exposure

between the two strategies every day.

247

:

So that's, we're really not

using the ETF as collateral.

248

:

We're using the cash, the

25% cash as collateral.

249

:

And the same thing goes with RSBT, right?

250

:

In that case, we're topping it

up with, uh, US Treasury Futures.

251

:

Interviewer: How does return

stacking for outperformance work?

252

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: Most

advisors that I know.

253

:

Are now kind of transitioning into this

period where they're, they're trying

254

:

to find a little bit of excess returns

by picking better stocks or picking

255

:

managers that pick better stocks to

try to outperform the equity markets.

256

:

And the same thing goes

for fixed income, right?

257

:

So you got the 60 40 portfolio,

and we're trying really hard as in

258

:

the advisor community to, to, to do

stock picking for our alpha, right?

259

:

Alpha is just, did you outperform the,

the market at the same level of risk?

260

:

And as we know from the SPI O reports,

you know, this is really hard to do.

261

:

It's number one, it's, you know, if you

look at the top quartile of managers

262

:

over the last 15 years, you're looking

at outperformance of one in a bit.

263

:

And then that's assuming that those top

quartile managers are going to continue to

264

:

outperform by one in a bit over the next.

265

:

15 years.

266

:

Right?

267

:

Which we know that doesn't tend to happen.

268

:

So getting excess returns by

stock picking and bond picking.

269

:

I think in the most competitive

landscape, the most liquid market

270

:

of the end, s and p five hundreds

and PTs X 60 is really, really hard.

271

:

Alright, so there's still the

desire to outperform at 60 40.

272

:

But maybe there's another way to

try to do that, and this is by the

273

:

concept of return stacking, right?

274

:

Where you can say, okay, look, I'm

not gonna try to pick stocks anymore.

275

:

I'm gonna give you 60 40.

276

:

So we're gonna get the market and then

I'm gonna stack these diversifiers on

277

:

top, like managed future trend following.

278

:

We think it will add an extra

two to 300 basis points a year.

279

:

That's, that's two to three times

and it's more consistent because it's

280

:

designed to be an absolute return product.

281

:

It'll be up seven outta 10 years, or

it has historically, and we expect

282

:

it, uh, we have high expectations

that it'll continue to do so.

283

:

And so, you know, most

years you'll be able to.

284

:

Stack a positive outcome to the

60 40 and use return stacking as

285

:

a an a return enhancer, right?

286

:

So we call like return stacking

for out performance, and that's

287

:

when you're, you're doing 60

40 and let's say 20, right?

288

:

Where you sell 20% of your equities

by something like RSST and then

289

:

you get your equities back plus

an extra 20 percentage trend.

290

:

Or you could do 10% equity,

sell 10% bond sell by RSBT.

291

:

10% by R SST for 10%, you get your 20%

right and then you get the benefit of

292

:

this return stacking for out performance.

293

:

Right?

294

:

Again, it doesn't happen every year.

295

:

Um, last couple years have been, we

had, you know, trend following, had

296

:

double digit returns in 2022, and it's

been kind of flat to down since, right?

297

:

So it doesn't happen every year, but most

years you're gonna do it more consistently

298

:

than we've seen in this topic.

299

:

Interviewer: What's the potential excess

return of stacking managed futures?

300

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: When you're trying

to pick stocks, oftentimes you have

301

:

to concentrate your holdings and.

302

:

What you'll see is you're taking more

of the same idiosyncratic risk, right?

303

:

Your equities need to live in an

environment where it's growth oriented,

304

:

and if there's a bear market, you,

it doesn't matter how much your

305

:

alpha has been, you're gonna go down

with the rest of the market, right?

306

:

So when you're trying to pick securities,

you often take more variance, more

307

:

volatility, and more downside.

308

:

The interesting thing about stacking

managed future trend is that, yes, you're

309

:

using leverage and to get an extra 20% on

top, so you're getting your 60, 40, 20.

310

:

But that 20 is, has such a characteristic

that when trends are prolonged and

311

:

and persistent, like in oh eight,

like in:

312

:

they tend to to offset losses.

313

:

So in the worst bear markets, when you

look at managed futures indices going

314

:

back to 2000 in every bear market,

they've had an ability to reduce your

315

:

maximum draw down while using leverage.

316

:

And we call that

defensive leverage, right?

317

:

Um, you, you, we always talk about

leverage of everybody has a leverage

318

:

aversion, but we need to define what

good leverage is and bad leverage is.

319

:

We say that you, you don't, you

want to avoid lice, you know,

320

:

leverage that is, um, that is

illiquid, concentrated and excessive.

321

:

And uh, and that's what you tend to

have when you pick stocks and you

322

:

concentrate or when you do the two x

ETFs when you're using leverage that is.

323

:

Non-correlated.

324

:

It is diversified, it's not

excessive, and it acts as an

325

:

offset during the worst of them.

326

:

So I think that that's the concept for

us on return stacking for returns, for

327

:

excess returns through out performance.

328

:

Interviewer: What is the risk management

benefit of stacking managed futures?

329

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: If you double exposure

to the same risk, like if you, if you

330

:

do the two XS and P 500, you don't

get double the return over time.

331

:

And that is a simple mathematical

reality, and it's due to the

332

:

compounding effect of higher volatility.

333

:

The higher the variance, the lower

the compound rate of return, right?

334

:

So the question is, how

can I increase my return?

335

:

While not increasing my volatility,

and because of the non correlation of

336

:

managed futures trend, you can, let's

say, you know, you can, you can have a

337

:

hundred percent s and p and then another

a hundred percent of managed futures.

338

:

Um, managed futures runs at 13%.

339

:

Volatility independently s and p

runs at 20% volatility independently.

340

:

But when you combine the 100

plus 100, the volatility of

341

:

the combination only goes up.

342

:

From 20 to 21, 20 2% right?

343

:

Versus doubling your

exposure to the s and p.

344

:

You are getting 40% volatility

and you're not actually, because

345

:

of the variance drag, you're

getting a lower compound return.

346

:

So by keeping the variance relatively

the same with that stack of managed

347

:

futures, you get the benefit from

compounding effect of that ex,

348

:

that diversifier on top, right?

349

:

So what you wanna do is you, if you

want to use leverage to increase your

350

:

returns, not increase your variance.

351

:

And that's what this type of

stacks do, do really well.

352

:

Interviewer: What's an example

of a practical use case for

353

:

return Stacking managed futures?

354

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: There are, you know,

hard diversified advisors that have

355

:

been, you know, pleaded the case to their

investors to make room in the portfolio

356

:

to hold these managed futures funds.

357

:

And, um, and they're towing the line, but

they're feeling it at this point, right?

358

:

That line item risk that

nobody can understand.

359

:

It becomes really, really

difficult for them.

360

:

So let's say we have an advisor that has,

uh, 10% allocation of managed futures

361

:

and, um, and it's been rough to hold.

362

:

Uh, but they don't wanna stack, they

don't wanna have to explain to clients

363

:

that they're using leverage, that

they're stacking in an extra 20% on top.

364

:

Well, what they could do instead is

they could, they could decide to sell

365

:

their existing managed futures funds

that are really difficult to hold.

366

:

You know, now you have $10 cash, right?

367

:

You can then sell an extra

10% of your equities, right?

368

:

So you have $20 cash.

369

:

You buy RSST for 10%, and when you buy

that SST for 10% and you are getting that

370

:

combined line item risk, the combined

line line items, you're getting back

371

:

your 10% of equities and then you're

getting back your managed futures.

372

:

And so the client will see $10 cash.

373

:

$10 in RSST and then the rest of their

portfolio, they'll see it as, oh,

374

:

we're being very conservative here.

375

:

We got rid of that terrible line item.

376

:

Um, we got this thing that is giving

me similar returns to the s and p

377

:

plus some more, which is interesting.

378

:

And I have $10 cash that I

guess my advisor can use it for.

379

:

When there's blood on the streets,

you can, you know, buy stocks when,

380

:

if there's a big draw down for

you to double down or you can just

381

:

simply keep it in high yielding cash.

382

:

Right?

383

:

But when you x-ray that portfolio,

yeah, it's dry powder, right?

384

:

But when you x-ray that portfolio, what

the client's actually getting was the

385

:

original portfolio they had, they just,

it's an in an easy to hold package, right?

386

:

They, they, you x-ray it, you get

your, you know, 90% of what you had

387

:

before in the 10% managed futures.

388

:

But they see cash, RSST and the rest.

389

:

And so you don't need to use

leverage in your client's portfolios.

390

:

Uh.

391

:

To use return stacking it, it is,

there is a way to even, to make it

392

:

very conservative, just as, just as

conservative, but the one key benefit

393

:

is that masking the line item risk that

always is difficult to hold behaviorally.

394

:

So that's the, there's, there's return

stacking for, for outperformance and

395

:

return stacking for diversification.

396

:

And those are the, the, you know,

really neat, neat ways to look at it.

397

:

Interviewer: Where can we learn

more about return stacking?

398

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: I think the world of

investing and advice is going to change

399

:

now that we can do what I just described.

400

:

Right, and, and we're, we're

focusing here on managed futures

401

:

trend, but there's a lot of things

one can stack and, um, and there's,

402

:

there's a lot more to explore here.

403

:

So I encourage everybody to,

to go to return stack.com

404

:

and learn a bit more about what

are the possibilities here.

About the Podcast

Show artwork for Get Stacked Investment Podcast
Get Stacked Investment Podcast

Listen for free

About your hosts

Profile picture for Rodrigo Gordillo

Rodrigo Gordillo

Rodrigo Gordillo is the President and Portfolio Manager at ReSolve Asset Management Global, an alternative asset management firm specializing in globally diversified systematic investment strategies. He co-founded ReSolve Asset Management Inc. in 2015 and expanded to ReSolve Asset Management Global in 2021. Starting his career at John Hancock focusing on pensions, Gordillo transitioned to the ultra-high-net-worth sector with i3 Advisors Inc. He held significant roles at Macquarie Private Wealth, Dundee Goodman Private Wealth, and Richardson GMP, enhancing his expertise in investment decisions and client wealth management.
Profile picture for Corey Hoffstein

Corey Hoffstein

Corey Hoffstein is the CEO and Chief Investment Officer of Newfound Research, a quantitative investment and research firm based in the Greater Tampa Bay Area, United States. Hoffstein co-founded Newfound Research with the aim of assisting investors in proactively managing investment risks through diversification, specifically by leveraging Return Stacking™ strategies. The firm specializes in managing alternative strategies and capital-efficient solutions, enabling the implementation of these innovative investment concepts. In addition to his role at Newfound Research, Hoffstein also serves as a Portfolio Manager at Return Stacked® Portfolio Solutions.