Episode 24

Trend vs. Carry: Why You Need Both — And What Happened in Q2

In this Q2 2026 commentary, Rodrigo Gordillo and Adam Butler review the Return Stacked® ETF suite, highlighting how combining trend and carry strategies capture unique signals during supply and demand shocks. The conversation also covers merger arbitrage as an overlooked corporate bond alternative, alongside the mechanics of gold and Bitcoin stacking. Finally, the two discuss the launch of the International Stocks & Managed Futures ETF (RSIT), which quickly grew to over $60 million in assets, and the addition of new agricultural markets to the trend and carry strategies.

Topics Discussed

• Diversification of risk using trend and carry strategies within investment portfolios

• Launch and performance of RSIT (International Developed Trend ETF) and addition of agricultural markets

• Understanding and capturing carry (roll yield) in energy and futures markets

• Mechanics and performance of Return Stacking ETFs including RSSB, RSSX, and RSBA

• Benefits of merger arbitrage as a diversifier and corporate bond alternative

• Managing behavioral challenges and providing transparency to advisors using Return Stacking

• Minimizing hidden financing and funding costs when using futures overlays

The performance data quoted above represents past performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. The investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor's shares, when sold or redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost, and current performance may be lower or higher than the performance quoted above.

For prospectus and performance and risks visit the fund pages.

RSST – https://www.returnstackedetfs.com/rsst-return-stacked-us-stocks-managed-futures/

RSIT - https://www.returnstackedetfs.com/rsit-international-stocks-managed-futures/

RSBT – https://www.returnstackedetfs.com/rsbt-return-stacked-bonds-managed-futures/

RSSY – https://www.returnstackedetfs.com/rssy-return-stacked-us-stocks-futures-yield/

RSBY – https://www.returnstackedetfs.com/rsby-return-stacked-bonds-futures-yield/

RSBA – https://www.returnstackedetfs.com/rsba-return-stacked-bonds-merger-arbitrage/

RSSB – https://www.returnstackedetfs.com/rssb-return-stacked-global-stocks-bonds/

RSSX – https://www.returnstackedetfs.com/rssx-return-stacked-us-stocks-gold-bitcoin/

BTGD – https://quantifyfunds.com/stackedbitcoingoldetf/btgd/

RSSX does not invest directly in Bitcoin or Gold. Exposures to gold and bitcoin will be done via exchange traded funds and futures contracts, hence the fund does not invest directly in bitcoin or any other digital asset, and does not invest directly in gold or gold bullion

Investors should carefully consider the investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses of Return Stacked® ETFs lineup before investing. This and other important information about the Return Stacked® ETF lineup is contained in their respective prospectus. For a prospectus or summary prospectus with this and other information about the Funds, please click the links above. Investments involve risk. Principal loss is possible. Unlike mutual funds, ETFs may trade at a premium or discount to their net asset value. Brokerage commissions may apply and would reduce returns.

Tidal Investments, LLC (“Tidal”) serves as investment adviser to the Funds and the Funds’ Subsidiary.

Newfound Research LLC (“Newfound”) serves as investment sub-adviser to RSST, RSIT, RSBT, RSSY, RSBY, RSBA, RSSB, and RSSX.

ReSolve Asset Management SEZC (Cayman) (“ReSolve”) serves as futures trading advisor to the Return Stacked® Bonds & Managed Futures ETF (RSBT), the Return Stacked® U.S. Stocks and Managed Futures ETF (RSST), the Return Stacked® U.S. Stocks & Futures Yield ETF (RSSY), the Return Stacked® Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY), Return Stacked® U.S. Stocks & Gold/Bitcoin ETF (RSSX), Return Stacked® International Stocks & Managed Futures (RSIT) and their respective Subsidiaries.

Quantify Chaos Advisors, LLC (“Quantify”) serves as the sub-adviser to the STKd 100% Bitcoin & 100% Gold ETF (BTGD). Quantify has entered into a brand licensing agreement with Newfound and Resolve granting Quantify the right to use the “STKd” brand, a derivative of Return Stacked®. Neither the Trust nor the Adviser is a party to this agreement. In exchange for the branding rights, Quantify will pay Newfound and ReSolve a fee based on a percentage of the Fund’s unitary management fee.

The Return Stacked® ETFs suite is distributed by Foreside Fund Services, LLC, Member FINRA/SIPC. Foreside is not related to Tidal, Newfound, ReSolve or Quantify.

Definitions:

Duration: refers to the average life of a debt instrument and serves as a measure of that instrument’s interest rate risk. Beta: how much an investment moves vs. a benchmark (like the market). Alpha: refers to returns above that of a passive market benchmark SocGen: is a common abbreviation for Société Générale S.A. Trend index: tracks returns from trend-following strategies, aiming to capture gains from sustained market price movements across assets. FTSE 100 Index: Financial Times Stock Exchange 100 Index DAX index: Deutscher Aktienindex is the benchmark stock market index of the Frankfurt Stock Exchange Nikkei 225 or Nikkei Stock Average is the leading stock market index for the Tokyo Stock Exchange (TSE) Alpha merger Index: tracks returns from merger arbitrage strategies, aiming to capture deal-related profits independent of the broader market.

A fund’s NAV is the sum of all its assets less any liabilities, divided by the number of shares outstanding. The market price is the most recent price at which the fund was traded.

Investments involve risk. Principal loss is possible. Unlike mutual funds, ETFs may trade at a premium or discount to their net asset value. Brokerage commissions may apply and would reduce returns. Bitcoin Investment Risk: The Fund’s indirect investment in bitcoin, through futures contracts and Underlying Funds, exposes it to the unique risks of this emerging innovation. Bitcoin’s price is highly volatile, and its market is influenced by the changing bitcoin network, fluctuating acceptance levels, and unpredictable usage trends. Not being a legal tender and operating outside central authority systems like banks, bitcoin faces potential government restrictions. The value of bitcoin has historically been subject to significant speculation, making trading and investing in bitcoin reliant on market sentiment rather than traditional fundamental analysis. Blockchain Technology Risk: Blockchain technology, which underpins bitcoin and other digital assets, is relatively new, and many of its applications are untested. The adoption of blockchain and the development of competing platforms or technologies could affect its usage. Cayman Subsidiary Risk: By investing in the Fund’s Cayman Subsidiary, the Fund is indirectly exposed to the risks associated with the Subsidiary’s investments. The futures contracts and other investments held by the Subsidiary are subject to the same economic risks that apply to similar investments if held directly by the Fund. The Subsidiary is not registered under the 1940 Act, and, unless otherwise noted in the Fund’s Prospectus, is not subject to all the investor protections of the 1940 Act. Commodity Risk: Investing in physical commodities is speculative and can be extremely volatile. Commodity-Linked Derivatives Tax Risk: The tax treatment of commodity-linked derivative instruments may be adversely affected by changes in legislation, regulations, or other legally binding authority. As a registered investment company (RIC), the Fund must derive at least 90% of its gross income each taxable year from certain qualifying sources of income under the Internal Revenue Code. If, as a result of any adverse future legislation, U.S. Treasury regulations, and/or guidance issued by the Internal Revenue Service, the income of the Fund from certain commodity-linked derivatives, including income from the Fund’s investments in the Subsidiary, were treated as non-qualifying income, the Fund may fail to qualify as RIC and/or be subject to federal income tax at the Fund level. The uncertainty surrounding the treatment of certain derivative instruments under the qualification tests for a RIC may limit the Fund’s use of such derivative instruments. Commodity Pool Regulatory Risk: The Fund’s investment exposure to futures instruments will cause it to be deemed to be a commodity pool, thereby subjecting the Fund to regulation under the Commodity Exchange Act and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission rules. Because the Fund is subject to additional laws, regulations, and enforcement policies, it may have increased compliance costs which may affect the operations and performance of the Fund. Credit Risk: Credit risk refers to the possibility that the issuer of a security will not be able to make principal and interest payments when due. Changes in an issuer’s credit rating or the market’s perception of an issuer’s creditworthiness may also affect the value of the Fund’s investment in that issuer. Derivatives Risk: Derivatives are instruments, such as futures contracts, whose value is derived from that of other assets, rates, or indices. The use of derivatives for non-hedging purposes may be considered to carry more risk than other types of investments. Digital Asset Risk: Digital assets like bitcoin, designed as mediums of exchange, are still an emerging asset class and are not presently widely used as such. They operate independently of any central authority or government backing and are subject to regulatory changes and extreme price volatility. Equity Market Risk: By virtue of the Fund’s investments in equity securities, equity ETFs, and equity index futures agreements, the Fund is exposed to equity securities both directly and indirectly which subjects the Fund to equity market risk. Common stocks are generally exposed to greater risk than other types of securities, such as preferred stock and debt obligations, because common stockholders generally have inferior rights to receive payment from specific issuers. Equity securities may experience sudden, unpredictable drops in value or long periods of decline in value. This may occur because of factors that affect securities markets generally or factors affecting specific issuers, industries, or sectors in which the Fund invests. Gold Investment Risks: The Fund will not invest directly in gold but will gain exposure through gold futures contracts and Underlying Funds. These investments are subject to significant risk due to the inherent volatility and unpredictability of the commodities markets. The value of these investments is typically derived from the price movements of physical gold or related economic variables. Leverage Risk: As part of the Fund’s principal investment strategy, the Fund will make investments in futures contracts to gain long and short exposure across four major asset classes (commodities, currencies, fixed income, and equities). These derivative instruments provide the economic effect of financial leverage by creating additional investment exposure to the underlying instrument, as well as the potential for greater loss. New Fund Risk: The Fund is a recently organized with no operating history. As a result, prospective investors do not have a track record or history on which to base their investment decisions. Non-Diversification Risk: The Fund is non-diversified, meaning that it is permitted to invest a larger percentage of its assets in fewer issuers than diversified funds. Underlying Fund Risk: The Fund’s investment strategy, involving indirect exposure to bitcoin and gold through one or more Underlying Funds, is subject to the risks associated with bitcoin as well as gold. Shareholders in the Fund bear both their proportionate share of expenses in the Fund and, indirectly, the expenses of the Underlying Funds.

Transcript
Adam Butler:

About half the time, trend rises to the occasion during a market

2

:

shock, but it doesn't always work.

3

:

And about half the time, carry rises to

the occasion, but it doesn't always work.

4

:

When you combine them in a portfolio,

now you've got a pretty decent

5

:

chance that one or the other is

gonna be activated in the right way

6

:

during the next market shock, right?

7

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: welcome everybody to

another episode of Stacked Unpacked.

8

:

this is where we go through the key

insights of our quarterly commentary.

9

:

if you don't know me, my name is

Rodrigo Gordillo, President of ReSolve

10

:

Asset Management and co-founder of

the Return Stacked suite of ETFs.

11

:

And I am joined today by, Adam

Butler, CIO of ReSolve Asset

12

:

Management, and also a co-founder

of Return Stacked suite of ETFs.

13

:

So before we begin, just a quick

note if you haven't gotten a chance

14

:

to go through the commentary.

15

:

if you go to

returnstackedetfs.com/literature,

16

:

you'll be at the top of the, uh, page.

17

:

You'll be able to hit commentary.

18

:

All of our commentaries are there,

including our latest commentary.

19

:

And, you'll also note that there's a bunch

of new, uh, PDF pieces and white papers

20

:

that you, you-- you're definitely gonna

wanna review, case studies as well as,

21

:

you know, simple explainers for, you know,

clients that you might be dealing with.

22

:

We also have the case, you know, talking

about leverage and whether it's a good

23

:

time to start adding, stacked portfolios.

24

:

All of that is available

in the same section.

25

:

So again,

returnstackedetfs.com/literature.

26

:

That'll get you there.

27

:

but let's get into Q1.

28

:

Let me share my screen here so we

can go through this together if you

29

:

don't have it in front of you already.

30

:

a

31

:

Adam Butler: First, a big nod to Corey

Hoffstein for, for creating this report.

32

:

He does the quarterlies typically

and does a phenomenal job.

33

:

So we're gonna walk through that basically

34

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: Indeed.

35

:

Okay, here we go.

36

:

So it's been a good, um, year thus far.

37

:

The whole suite is at just over $1.4

38

:

billion as of the end of the quarter.

39

:

It's a bit higher, today, and there's

been a new addition to the family, RSIT.

40

:

This is one of our most,

successful launches.

41

:

So clearly, you know, there's been,

for obvious reasons, a lot of change

42

:

in dynamics in terms of global vers- or

international versus domestic stocks.

43

:

RSIT is our international

stocks and managed futures ETF.

44

:

It launched on May 5th, and it

quickly got up to forty-seven

45

:

million by the end of the quarter.

46

:

We're over sixty, uh, million now.

47

:

So, that was the market asking for

something and us, being able to deliver

48

:

in, um, in, in a fairly fast manner.

49

:

So if there's anybody out there that

wants new stacks or new ideas, new

50

:

bases, uh, do communicate with us.

51

:

we are all ears and looking to

launch more, you know, a couple of

52

:

these throughout the, um, the year.

53

:

So what is the difference

between RSIT and RSST?

54

:

It is international developed.

55

:

It doesn't have emerging

markets, doesn't have US.

56

:

It has the same trend replication.

57

:

So w- as we go through this,

commentary, the trend, when we

58

:

discuss trend overlay, it'll be the

same across RSST and RSIT and RSBT.

59

:

The other new, uh, development is that

we have added a couple of new markets.

60

:

We've added agricultures to both the

futures yield products as well as the,

61

:

um, uh, the trend products, and that

happened in May and June respectively.

62

:

So I will kind of show you

what that has looked like.

63

:

let me just share the website here.

64

:

Adam Butler: By the way, if you haven't

visited the website, we keep making

65

:

substantial improvements to, help build

intuition around how the strategies work

66

:

and what they hold and, and how those

holdings change over time, et cetera, both

67

:

capital, a capital view and a risk view.

68

:

So definitely encourage you to

revisit the site 'cause they change

69

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: So I just wanted to show

you, if you go to the, if you go to ETFs

70

:

or an RSSY and you click all the way down

to portfolio risk allocations, you'll be

71

:

able to see the new markets that we've

added, and you can visualize when…

72

:

You can see exactly when

they were added here, right?

73

:

that gold, dark gold and purple.

74

:

And if you wanna get more granular as

to what we have added at that times,

75

:

then you can go down here and see when

they were added, what the positions

76

:

were, and what the markets are.

77

:

So coffee, cocoa, corn,

soybean, and Chicago wheat.

78

:

Now, same thing applies

to the trend strategies.

79

:

You'll see it again if you go down

here and click on grains, same markets.

80

:

Now, Adam, let's talk a

little bit about that.

81

:

So, you know, we wanna make sure

that people recog- at least, that

82

:

we acknowledge that this is not

about, uh, trying to time any sort

83

:

of market that we feel like saw…

84

:

That it's a good time

for us to get into this.

85

:

what was the rationale for us adding

these markets to both of the stacks?

86

:

Adam Butler: All things equal, the,

the carry strategy is designed to try

87

:

to deliver an, you know, m- maximum

risk-adjusted returns over time.

88

:

And so all things equal, you wanna

continue to add as many bets as

89

:

you can to the portfolio that

are uncorrelated with all of the

90

:

other positions in the portfolio.

91

:

As you add more diversification, you

increase the expected efficiency of the

92

:

portfolio, the, the returns you're able

to deliver for the same level of risk.

93

:

So all things equal, it's nice

to be able to add new markets.

94

:

we weren't able to add

them, reliably before.

95

:

We took over, ReSolve

actually took over trading.

96

:

We've been running, future strategies

for over a decade now and, have

97

:

experience running, you know,

mar- more challenging markets.

98

:

And one thing about the grains and the

softs is the CFTC limits the number of

99

:

contracts you can hold in these markets

in the front-month futures contract.

100

:

And so the way you actually are

able to get scale into these markets

101

:

is by owning, a little bit of the

front month, but then also expanding

102

:

your exposure into the second and

third, the back months, as well.

103

:

So we've got lots of

experience doing that.

104

:

We trade a, a much larger, universe

of futures markets in our hedge

105

:

funds, because they're even more

constrained in terms of, you know,

106

:

redemptions and all that kind of stuff.

107

:

but we felt very comfortable adding

the, the grains to the carry strategy

108

:

and to the trend strategy once we were

able to operationalize it in-house.

109

:

the trend strategy, it also adds value

at the margin because the underlying

110

:

funds that represent the benchmark

that we mark against, they trade the

111

:

grains and the softs as part of their

mandates, and so we wanna be able to

112

:

trade all the markets that they trade.

113

:

Now, for liquidity reasons, typically

those big funds that comprise the

114

:

benchmark, they don't trade a lot of risk

in those markets, but they do trade some.

115

:

And so, you know, the way we model our

replication strategy is that we'll be

116

:

adding risk to those markets as part

of the replication in proportion to

117

:

how much risk is warranted based on

how well they help to replicate the

118

:

underlying benchmark at the margin, right?

119

:

So two slightly different reasons why we

wanna add these new markets, both, from a

120

:

prospective standpoint and e- efficiency

standpoint, not based on whether Rodrigo

121

:

and I and Corey think it's a prospective

time to own grains or cocoa or sugar.

122

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: Yeah.

123

:

Yeah, that's a great summary, Adam.

124

:

So, anyway, new markets are

pretty excited about that.

125

:

Why don't we go into the, kind of

the simplest product right now.

126

:

this is RSSB.

127

:

just to g- we're trying to replicate

there is 100% exposure to global

128

:

equities and 100% exposure to a

laddered treasury bond portfolio.

129

:

And as you can see, just by kind

of eyeballing this, we've done a

130

:

pretty good job replicating 100/100

portfolio, since in-- over the

131

:

last 12 months since its inception.

132

:

Now, one of the things to note is that

performance this quarter, if you look at

133

:

the NAV, it underperformed by about 100

basis points to the index that we track.

134

:

Now, that is-- We want to point out

that last quarter we outperformed by

135

:

100 basis points, to that index, and

that has more to do with when the NAV

136

:

is struck versus when the index values

are updated at the end of the quarter.

137

:

S- it, it tends to…

138

:

De- depending on the quarter, it will

be plus or minus 100 basis points.

139

:

It's just an accounting issue.

140

:

It is really not a tracking level issue.

141

:

We're tracking the index quite nicely.

142

:

So-

143

:

Adam Butler: that, that difference

was made up the very next day.

144

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: That's right.

145

:

Exactly.

146

:

And so again, what's

the use case for RSSB?

147

:

The use case for RSSB is to make room

in your portfolio to create cash,

148

:

continue to remain invested fully.

149

:

So you take, you know, 5% of your

equities, 5% of your bonds, sell that, buy

150

:

5% of RSSB, you get all your allocation

back, plus you got $5 ready for you to use

151

:

out of the box for whatever it is, whether

you want some to ra- to have cash ready,

152

:

whether you wanna add another diversifier

that we don't have in our lineup.

153

:

It is a very dynamic and

one of our biggest ETFs.

154

:

So everything is in line there for RSSB.

155

:

so let's get to the, to the trend.

156

:

Basically, this quarter, if I-- if we

go straight to the chart here for the

157

:

last year, what's been interesting to

see is how the top-down small universe,

158

:

so that's the top-down number one, has

really lagged, has really underperformed,

159

:

over the last 12 months versus

160

:

Adam Butler: worth taking 30

seconds to, to just go into what

161

:

bottom-up and top-down mean here?

162

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: Sure.

163

:

Yeah.

164

:

So, so there's t-top-down is wh-when you

think about trend replication and what's

165

:

been the most common thing and, and

way to replicate all these, kinda hedge

166

:

fund replication, trend replication has

been just m-literally looking over the

167

:

recent period on, about price, trying

to match or re-replicate the movement of

168

:

that, index based on different weights.

169

:

So the best match, the best regression

analysis over the recent period to

170

:

that index, match the weights, and then

hold it for one period until you do

171

:

another analysis and rebalance again.

172

:

So I'm bas-- you're basically looking in

the rear view mirror and saying, "What

173

:

are the likely weights that we would

be able to replicate historically?"

174

:

And that tends to do a pretty good job

at replicating the performance of a

175

:

broad basket of managed futures managers.

176

:

and there's a couple of

ways that you can do that.

177

:

You do it with a small universe.

178

:

So the small universe, I believe,

is nine futures contracts.

179

:

and then there's a larger universe

of, 20-plus contracts that, you

180

:

know, there's pros and cons to that.

181

:

Adam, I don't know if you wanna

speak to what the, the pros

182

:

and cons of those are very

183

:

Adam Butler: Yeah.

184

:

There's a, there's a small universe

and, and there's the 33 market universe

185

:

that is now the expanded universe,

including the grains and the softs, right?

186

:

So really the top-down, we're just

trying to find the, the, market weights

187

:

of the individual futures that when

we sort of back-project them over the

188

:

past 40 to 60 days, best mimic h- the,

performance of the underlying benchmark.

189

:

That's the top-down.

190

:

And we can use a small basket of

markets to do that, or we can use a

191

:

larger basket of markets to do that.

192

:

There's pros and cons for both, which

I won't get into now, but it's…

193

:

What's interesting is that those models

actually are not perfectly correlated,

194

:

so when we put them together, the

combination does much better in tracking

195

:

the benchmark than either one does alone.

196

:

Okay?

197

:

So that's one component, the top-down.

198

:

And that the bottom-up component is us

recognizing the trend funds trade trend

199

:

strategies on generally we understand what

the constituents, what the markets they're

200

:

trading are, and then just trying to fit

the actual process that the managers in

201

:

the benchmark are using, what tre- what

trends apply to what markets, and then

202

:

we find the weights of those, and we,

we just effectively run that, right?

203

:

So the, the bottom-up

is process replication.

204

:

The top-down is portfolio replication.

205

:

They all, have strengths and weaknesses.

206

:

They're different.

207

:

They thrive and are

weak at different times.

208

:

When you put them all together, they're

much stronger than any one of them alone

209

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: Yeah, and what you

see here is the black line is the index.

210

:

The green line is the

combination of all three.

211

:

And what you're seeing in this

past 12-month period is that the

212

:

top-down has done really poorly.

213

:

it-- But just briefly, I'll bring up the

214

:

Adam Butler: Well, the top-down small

215

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: top-down small universe.

216

:

But the top-down small universe,

if we look back in the last

217

:

quarter, so this is looking at, at

:

218

:

and, and, and it wasn't very

good at tracking, right?

219

:

You can see that the black line

took a big dive and then recovered.

220

:

You know, the top-down small did not take

a big hit, and that's why it did better.

221

:

So again, we're gonna-- there's gonna

be a, a big theme here about diversic-

222

:

diversity and diversification.

223

:

These are just three models we're

using to help us get a better fit

224

:

for that index, and it's done a

pretty good job since inception.

225

:

And you can kinda-- This line here,

what it represents is if you had a

226

:

perfect fit, that green line would just

hug the, the, horizontal line here.

227

:

And you can see it

meanders back and forth.

228

:

Sometimes it's better,

sometimes it's worse.

229

:

this is not a big difference here, so

you're looking at a, you know, 0.95

230

:

fit versus if you were just to use

one of the three models, you'll see

231

:

that the variance is quite high.

232

:

So that's why you wanna

diversify across the board.

233

:

Okay, so on the trend rep-replication

side, we're doing well.

234

:

What happened with trend

itself, versus last quarter?

235

:

So the green dot is the positions that we

had in, different markets last quarter,

236

:

and the black bar is where we are today.

237

:

So not much of a drastic

difference here on the bond side.

238

:

Really, the story is in equities, a,

a larger long position in equities

239

:

than we had slight short positions

in equity markets last quarter.

240

:

not surprisingly, a larger position

in oil, versus what we had at

241

:

the beginning of last quarter.

242

:

You know, the trend has gotten or

had been pretty strong back leading

243

:

up to the end of the quarter,

and throughout that quarter.

244

:

And then, you know, currencies, the

euro, big short versus the beginning.

245

:

a lot of small, very, very small

positions in, in the agricultural,

246

:

so not much of an impact.

247

:

And, and I think I missed

oil, uh, gold here.

248

:

So gold was a big change.

249

:

We had a big long gold position, and

now, by the end of the quarter, we

250

:

had a slightly short gold position.

251

:

Not surprising given the path that it's

taken, and we are following trends.

252

:

so that's trend, The trend and, uh, and

carry, which we'll get into for the-- You

253

:

guys can look at all the details here.

254

:

but basically for the trend index

itself, for the last quarters have

255

:

roughly been flat to slightly up, not

much contribution in contrast to the

256

:

first part, the first quarter of the

year, which contributed pretty nicely

257

:

to offset losses in, in other markets.

258

:

But it's been flat since.

259

:

so you guys can review the performance

here in more detail with the report.

260

:

RSIT will be similar.

261

:

There's not a lot of, price data there

to go because we just launched it.

262

:

let's talk about-

263

:

Adam Butler: to the chart, just hold

off on the chart for a second because

264

:

I wanna, I wanna, I wanna tell a

quick story because I think it's…

265

:

This is a really great opportunity

to build intuition around carry.

266

:

so you can imagine coming into,

February, this is sort of in

267

:

advance of any, initiation of

conflict in the, in the Gulf.

268

:

The US is moving military

assets into the Gulf.

269

:

Obviously, this is being observed by all

the participants in the energy markets.

270

:

I want to zero in on a few of

the major participants because

271

:

it helps to tell the story and

build the intuition behind carry.

272

:

So imagine a refinery in Europe.

273

:

They're seeing, many military

assets amassed in the Gulf.

274

:

They're anticipating conflict.

275

:

as time goes on, the probability

of conflict breaking out

276

:

continues to escalate.

277

:

they can't shut down the refinery, okay?

278

:

For operate…

279

:

for mechanical reasons, they can't

shut it down, and because they owe

280

:

refined products to clients downstream.

281

:

So they're getting panicky.

282

:

They need product, and they're worried

that if there's a conflict, then the

283

:

strait's gonna close and they're not

gonna be able to get access to product.

284

:

Okay?

285

:

That's one stakeholder.

286

:

The…

287

:

Think of another, you know, a,

a producer in the North Sea.

288

:

So they're a long way from the Gulf, their

production is tick- is, is moving along

289

:

tickety-boo, but they're noticing that

refineries are starting to get concerned.

290

:

The oil price, the front month of

oil price is rising as refineries

291

:

scramble to get product m- to make

sure that they can meet demand.

292

:

they are trying to, to ramp up near-term

production as much as possible to help

293

:

to meet that demand because they're

able to sell that oil at much higher

294

:

prices now than they expected if they

can ramp up production quickly, okay?

295

:

And then they're continuing to…

296

:

They know that they're gonna be continuing

to sell, to produce oil for many years

297

:

in the future, and they're continuing

to sell long-term forward oil contracts

298

:

and for, for long-term delivery, okay?

299

:

Now you've got this oil trader

in the middle, all right?

300

:

They own storage tanks

and they own oil tankers.

301

:

Now, their day has just come, okay?

302

:

There's a major conflict brewing,

there's a major panic at refiners,

303

:

and they can solve this problem.

304

:

So yeah, they've got a bunch

of oil already in storage.

305

:

They can send tankers to, to, to that

oil and pull that out of storage and, and

306

:

put it on the water and start delivering

that to the refiners, all right?

307

:

But they also have the opportunity

to lease more tankers, send them,

308

:

for example, to the oil producer in

the North Sea, who is anxious to be

309

:

able to offload their oil at these

higher prices and collect that oil.

310

:

But while the, the trader has the

oil on the tankers, they own it.

311

:

They're at risk, okay?

312

:

And they don't want it.

313

:

They're not in the

business of speculation.

314

:

So they take on that spot oil, and they…

315

:

as soon as they take that on,

they sell forward that oil at

316

:

the point at which they expect to

deliver that oil to the refinery.

317

:

Okay?

318

:

The question is, who bears the risk?

319

:

Okay?

320

:

The refinery's willing to, to…

321

:

They need the oil and they know what

their profit margin is approximately.

322

:

The producer is having a lottery payday,

but the trader, they don't wanna pay

323

:

the, to, to take on that risk of the…

324

:

'Cause if the, the conflict resolves while

that oil sits on the water, then they

325

:

take that massive loss on the inventory.

326

:

Okay?

327

:

So they're selling forward the delivery

to the refiner as soon as they take

328

:

the oil on board the, the tankers.

329

:

All right?

330

:

The question is, who bears the

risk and why do they bear the risk?

331

:

Well, they bear the risk.

332

:

The answer is the future speculators,

those running carry strategies.

333

:

They bear the risk.

334

:

They ensure the risk that the, the

traders don't wanna bear until that

335

:

oil gets delivered to the refinery.

336

:

All right?

337

:

And the cost of bearing that risk is

the payment to the future speculators.

338

:

And

339

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: I.e.

340

:

us if we're long futures,

if we're long oil

341

:

Adam Butler: Exactly.

342

:

We're long oil futures.

343

:

We are harvesting the fees that all

of the other players in the market

344

:

don't want to pa- to bear the risk for.

345

:

Okay?

346

:

Now let's show that, that s- chart, okay?

347

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: before--

Just, just a couple of thing.

348

:

I'll, I'll add this chart.

349

:

So this is also something that's on the,

the, RSSY and RSBY site, which is the

350

:

basically risk-adjusted target weight and

the risk-adjusted carry on the right side.

351

:

So the-- Basically what we're

saying is that the higher the

352

:

carry, the likely higher weight that

we're gonna give to those assets.

353

:

The lower the carry or negative

carry, we're gonna short those assets.

354

:

And what we were seeing is the front

month go up, the back month not go

355

:

up, and if you, if you bought the

back month and you let it roll up,

356

:

you were gonna make money, right?

357

:

So it's like we talked about this earlier.

358

:

It's like during COVID, you know,

when we needed toilet paper, people

359

:

panicked and went out to the grocery

store and bought all of the toilet

360

:

paper and could possibly, like, make

a secondary market and sell it for

361

:

more in their neighborhood, right?

362

:

But everybody stocked up.

363

:

Their basements was to

the hilt toilet paper.

364

:

Nothing really happened.

365

:

You used it up.

366

:

Inventory was, went back to normal,

and it was, it was a non-issue.

367

:

So it's the same type of idea here.

368

:

Now f- it'll be more clear as I

bring up the, this chart here.

369

:

so Adam, why don't we walk everybody

370

:

Adam Butler: Yeah, I'll

go th- I'll go through it.

371

:

So, so notably, the, the prices for

oil d- in del- for delivery in six to

372

:

nine months hasn't really moved much.

373

:

So the, you know, producers in

the North Sea are saying, "Yeah, I

374

:

think this is going to be resolved

relatively quickly," right?

375

:

"So I'm gonna just steadily sell my

oil at the, at the prevailing price.

376

:

I'm not gonna ask for a premium 'cause

I expect the, the price to, to rise.

377

:

I think it's gonna be resolved," right?

378

:

But at the front, there's

massive panic, right?

379

:

So the, at the front, the,

the price of oil is like $100.

380

:

Six to nine months in the future, oil's

selling for call, call it 60, $70, okay?

381

:

So there's this huge

steep c- backwardation.

382

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: So to-- just

to be clear, at the beginning of

383

:

the year, here on the right-hand

side, you'll see the yield.

384

:

This is the zero ye- line.

385

:

At the beginning of the year, the

front month and the back month were

386

:

basically the same price, right?

387

:

Let's say whatever, $60 oil.

388

:

Both of them are…

389

:

By the time we're here, oil is-- on the

front month has gone up to 110, 120.

390

:

I can't remember where it peaked.

391

:

But the back month roughly

s- stayed pinned, right?

392

:

That is, that is now we're seeing

a massive roll yield that we could

393

:

capture, and the system's saying,

"Hey, we should probably go long."

394

:

And that's what this line shows here, the

difference between the one and the back

395

:

Adam Butler: Yep.

396

:

The green line there is the

difference between the front-month

397

:

price and back-month prices, okay?

398

:

And it's saying, "Wow, we're

getting paid a lot of money

399

:

to hold the front month here."

400

:

Okay?

401

:

And so we are very long the

front month of oil, okay?

402

:

But I don't wanna bury the lead, right?

403

:

Because what happened?

404

:

We…

405

:

Oil went up, like, 50% in the first

quarter, and then it dropped, like,

406

:

20, 25% in the second quarter, right?

407

:

So didn't we just earn a bunch of

money and then give it all back?

408

:

Well, this is the, the great thing

about carry and the great thing about

409

:

the fact that the-- there are actual

commercial players in the market

410

:

pricing risk and expressing the, the

level of panic of demand and supply

411

:

because they are sending signals well

in advance of when the price moves.

412

:

Okay?

413

:

Those signals said, "Wow, we should

be really long oil," back in,

414

:

like, mid to late January because

the panic was beginning to build.

415

:

But then as the actual deliveries were

made and the, the tightness in the market

416

:

receded and the panic receded, then that

gap closed, and we weren't getting paid

417

:

nearly as much to own the front month.

418

:

The carry signal dropped commensurately.

419

:

We therefore dropped our exposure to

oil, just in time for oil prices to drop.

420

:

So without burying the lead, you know,

in Brent Crude, the strategy, gained

421

:

about 400 basis points in the first

quarter and only gave back about 43

422

:

basis points in the second quarter, okay?

423

:

And that's just us getting signals

from the market that we were able to

424

:

use that were distinct from trend and

that working out really well, right?

425

:

So you can see oil prices

didn't peak until late May.

426

:

But by that time, the carry be-

has already begun to recede.

427

:

Our positioning had also

receded commensurately.

428

:

And so when the price collapsed,

our position had been-- had declined

429

:

substantially, and we just weren't

there for the, for the loss.

430

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: And you could see that

again in this chart here, if you kinda go

431

:

to energies and just select WTI and ICE,

you can see how quickly the positioning

432

:

went from max positioning to short.

433

:

Much faster than the s- the

price slowly going down.

434

:

And going back to this chart here, you

can see that, that, that the carry peaked

435

:

in, you know, just mid-February, got

another peak early March, stayed around

436

:

and then completely collapsed bef- And

so we were able to really reduce our

437

:

positioning and even start shorting it way

before we started, giving all that back.

438

:

So that's kind of the difference

in, in price and carry and, and how

439

:

that market adjusted accordingly.

440

:

Adam Butler: Yeah, exactly.

441

:

And I'm gonna, I'm, I think we should

actually leave that dotted line for,

442

:

for readers to investigate on their own.

443

:

There's, there's another twist and nuance

here that is very worth digging into, but

444

:

we don't really have time to do it justice

here, so, you know, I, we, we can probably

445

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: Sure.

446

:

Adam Butler: move along.

447

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: All right.

448

:

So that's, future-- And by the

way, at this point, you can ask

449

:

any questions, that you want.

450

:

Let's take a quick pause now

that we have a, we have a lot

451

:

of people in the room now.

452

:

If anybody has any questions,

go ahead and post them in the

453

:

respective, platforms that you're in.

454

:

We can see them here live.

455

:

we're also gonna do a quick poll just

to pause now that we're halfway through.

456

:

just out of curiosity, Ani, would

you mind pushing that poll up?

457

:

This is the first time we're using,

StreamYard to do this, so you just

458

:

have to select one, two, or three.

459

:

So the question is, do you own

any return stacked ETFs today?

460

:

First answer is, it's a

core part of my portfolio.

461

:

Second one is, I'm dabbling.

462

:

Third is, I'm still exploring,

really haven't made a decision.

463

:

I'll give everybody a few minutes

there to answer those questions while

464

:

we scroll down, and, and just kind of

finish up here on what the positioning

465

:

has been for the futures yield portfolio.

466

:

again, the biggest

467

:

Adam Butler: Yeah.

468

:

It's been neat to see fixed income come

back into the portfolio, where we've

469

:

been either neutral or, or generally

kind of short, for a long while in,

470

:

in the carry portfolio, consistent

with an inverted yield curve, right?

471

:

But, we're, we're starting to see

some, some normalization there and

472

:

except for the gilt, obviously,

which we had a very strong position

473

:

in the end of last quarter, and

that, has gone slightly negative.

474

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: Yeah, and in, in

475

:

Adam Butler: yeah,

equities are kind of mixed.

476

:

Yep, yep.

477

:

Equities are kind of mixed.

478

:

We've actually been kind of net

small short equities, for a while.

479

:

The dividend yield in equities,

like, you know, are, are typically

480

:

lower than the yield on cash.

481

:

And so, so that informs a

s- a small short position.

482

:

Obviously, Euro stocks, the, the

yield there is higher than the Euro

483

:

cash rate, and so we, we do have

a small, positive position there.

484

:

And we flipped from short

to small long in the S&P too

485

:

Yeah.

486

:

So you can see the, the,

the crude oil positions.

487

:

that was actually, you know, at the end of

the last quarter was kind of right when we

488

:

were flipping from long and, had been…

489

:

It, it sort of went neutral.

490

:

We're still long the products.

491

:

obviously there's strong carry there

492

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: And

then currencies and ags

493

:

Adam Butler: Yep.

494

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: Oh, we're missing

the dots here on this, on the

495

:

agriculture.

496

:

' Adam Butler: cause they weren't in the,

497

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: Oh yeah, they weren't.

498

:

That's right

499

:

Adam Butler: Yeah, yeah.

500

:

But,

501

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: All right.

502

:

So yeah, on the carry side

is we had another, flat.

503

:

If we just extract the carry overlay,

there's another flat, quarter,

504

:

just on the, on the carry side.

505

:

Most of the returns came in--

A lot of the returns came in

506

:

that first quarter of the year.

507

:

And so similar trend in

carry, not much contribution.

508

:

RSSY up around 14%, mainly

due to the equity component.

509

:

RSBY flat, as you can

see, not much happened.

510

:

And then, we can get

into talking about RSBA.

511

:

This is the return

stacked bonds and merger

512

:

arbitrage.

513

:

Adam Butler: wanna,

514

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: Yep

515

:

Adam Butler: do we wanna pro-

pause and answer the question here?

516

:

It's about carry, and trend, and it might

be a good opportunity to chat about that.

517

:

or do you wanna wait till the end?

518

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: why don't

we wait till the end, Adam?

519

:

Let's get through the ETFs and

520

:

Adam Butler: Let's do it.

521

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: can discuss.

522

:

Adam Butler: Yep.

523

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: All

524

:

Adam Butler: So You'll remember--

You'll recall that merger

525

:

arbitrage is, a unique diversifier.

526

:

The, the principle is that you've got a…

527

:

Typically, one company

wants to buy another and…

528

:

But there's several months, in some

cases a, a, a year or more, between

529

:

when the buyer makes a bid for the

company and when the deal closes.

530

:

And, you know, there may

be some frictions, right?

531

:

The- there may be regulatory

issues that arise, that, you

532

:

know, v-various other th-things.

533

:

There's a lot of legal work

to do, obviously, which is

534

:

why it takes so much time.

535

:

and in the meantime, typically, the

company that's being bought doesn't

536

:

trade up fully to the price that

it's expected to be purchased at.

537

:

And the reason for that is because,

you know, th-that deal needs to be

538

:

funded in that time horizon, right?

539

:

So there's a, there's a time discount

on that deal, and there's this risk

540

:

that the deal may not close, right?

541

:

Now, in, in reality, in the modern era,

most of these deals close, but there's

542

:

still an embedded risk premium, okay?

543

:

And that risk premium that the deal

won't closed-- close, plus the cost

544

:

of carrying the position until it

closes, is the return that you earn on

545

:

the merger arbitrage strategy, right?

546

:

So, you know, we don't…

547

:

The s- the strategy that we use, the

merger arbitrage strategy, doesn't

548

:

just buy into every deal, okay?

549

:

We've got a sophisticated algorithm

that we use to identify which

550

:

deals are implying a sufficient

yield between now and when the deal

551

:

closes to justify the expected risk.

552

:

So you can, you can measure some

of the different risk factors,

553

:

and you can measure, obviously,

the difference between the current

554

:

price and the expected deal price.

555

:

Net of the cost of financing is the

expected return over that period, right?

556

:

So between all those factors, we're

only selecting a subset of all the deals

557

:

that we think represent the best value.

558

:

And at any given time, we

may not be fully invested.

559

:

There just may not be an, a

sufficient number of high-quality

560

:

deals that meet our thresholds

to allow us to be fully invested.

561

:

And if you pull up the chart, in, in

the piece, you can see how the number

562

:

of deals and our total exposure to the

merger arbitrage sleeve within the merger

563

:

arbitrage, ETF changes over time, right?

564

:

So each of those colors is a position

in the portfolio representing a deal

565

:

that we felt was, y-you know, met the,

the threshold to go into the portfolio.

566

:

At the moment, actually, we have

quite a few deals in the portfolio,

567

:

but sometimes we don't, right?

568

:

so I want you to scroll down

because I think this, this strategy

569

:

gets way too little respect.

570

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: Agreed

571

:

Adam Butler: And, you know, when, when

you, when you look at this kind of…

572

:

The, the way to think about the merger

arbitrage strategy, which we stack on

573

:

top of a treasury bond ladder, okay,

is it's effectively the same as or,

574

:

or a substitution for corporate bonds.

575

:

Okay?

576

:

It has approximately the same kind

of risk over the long term, but the

577

:

risk arises not from the probability

that the bonds will def- be defaulted

578

:

on, but rather the risk that these

merger arbitrage deals won't close.

579

:

Okay?

580

:

It's a completely

different source of risk.

581

:

It has very low correlation to

typical corporate credit risk, and

582

:

it's a really great complement to a

corporate credit book for that reason.

583

:

Approximately the same risk.

584

:

It's effectively a credit premium,

but you're pricing a different risk.

585

:

And over the long term, it has

very competitive, risk return

586

:

characteristics to corporate bonds.

587

:

Historically, it's got a nice

little edge over corporate bonds

588

:

from a sharpe ratio standpoint.

589

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: Yeah.

590

:

Adam Butler: so, I mean, it's

like Rodney Dangerfield, man.

591

:

It just don't get no respect.

592

:

I think it really needs

a lot more respect.

593

:

It, it earns a substantial sleeve in

portfolios alongside corporate bonds, and

594

:

I would urge you to take a closer look

595

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: Yeah, if you're

looking at corporate bonds, high-yield

596

:

bonds, what you are doing is you're

taking-- So, so again, I think it's

597

:

super important what Adam said, right?

598

:

If we disaggregate your high-yield

bonds, your corporate bonds, if we

599

:

actually examine where the returns come

from of tho- of, of that, it's a stack.

600

:

Let's, even though you don't

think it's a stack, it is.

601

:

It's basically the return of

Treasury, a la- the Treasury ladder,

602

:

and the credit, premium, okay?

603

:

That's what you are getting when

you are taking on, when you're

604

:

buying a cr- a, corporate bond fund.

605

:

All we're saying here is like, look,

we got-- we're giving you that Treasury

606

:

ladder, and we're stacking something

different, something that has, as

607

:

a stack, a similar risk profile as

the other stack that you're used

608

:

to, that tends to have a 10% to 20%

allocation in most advisors' portfolios.

609

:

And we're saying, "Look, do

you want the same level of

610

:

directional risk as your equities?"

611

:

'Cause that's what credit…

612

:

We've always heard, like, corporate

bonds act like a bond on the way up and

613

:

act like the st- stocks on the way down.

614

:

We saw it in 2008.

615

:

We saw, we've seen it numerous times.

616

:

You kind of saw it here in this chart, the

black line taking a massive dip, right?

617

:

That's the credit acting in the

same direction as your equities.

618

:

That's not the diversifier

part of your bonds.

619

:

It's the Treasury ladder that's

a diversifier part of your bonds.

620

:

And so, what do you want to stack on

top to give the, the-- if you were to

621

:

get, switch out of credit, funds and

high-yield funds into another bond fund,

622

:

I think this is a great substitute.

623

:

And, uh, and you can see here by the green

line just how, how much smoother the ride

624

:

is and less risky it is on the downside.

625

:

So, do not sleep on this.

626

:

We have a couple of pieces that

really lay this out simply.

627

:

Go to the website, go to the literature

page, and, and explore, the merger

628

:

arbitrage and RSBA component.

629

:

if there are any questions on that,

just please post them on the site.

630

:

Okay.

631

:

RSBA for the last three months, was up

one point four three percent versus US

632

:

Treasury ladder at zero point three two.

633

:

same kind of return as US corporates and,

uh, slightly higher in, in US T-bills.

634

:

So it's doing its job slowly

but surely edging forward.

635

:

All right, now to the fun one, RSSX.

636

:

So RSSX is stacking a, a gold Bitcoin

strategy on top of US equities.

637

:

The gold Bitcoin strategy is a equal

risk contribution, strategy, so it's

638

:

not set weights to gold or Bitcoin.

639

:

It's looking at the recent history,

and as volatilities change between

640

:

the two, we are giving more

weight to one versus the other.

641

:

Gold tends to have significantly less

volatility than Bitcoin, therefore gold

642

:

tends to represent a higher, weight

in the overlay, in the, in the stack.

643

:

So that ratio will change over time,

but the goal here is that they both

644

:

contribute the same amount of risk.

645

:

Okay?

646

:

Now, for Q1, the diversification

benefits of this stack were

647

:

quite clear to everybody, right?

648

:

Gold did fantastic.

649

:

Bitcoin didn't do so well,

but it was a great diversifier

650

:

for the equity portfolio.

651

:

Gold was up, Bitcoin was down.

652

:

In the second half, both

gold and Bitcoin were down.

653

:

But actually, from a risk-adjusted

perspective, Bitcoin was down less.

654

:

Even though they seem like they've

gone and, and looked in the same

655

:

direction, the drift seems very similar.

656

:

The correlation between gold and Bitcoin

was around point four nine for the, for

657

:

the year, and the same for the quarter.

658

:

So correlation's still low.

659

:

It just happens to be one of those

quarters where both of them are

660

:

down, at a time when equities are up.

661

:

So equity's up around

fourteen, fifteen percent.

662

:

The gold-Bitcoin, match was down

around fourteen-plus percent.

663

:

Okay, so not a great quarter

for this, but as a diversifier,

664

:

we see the benefits, right?

665

:

It- it's zigging when the

other assets are zagging.

666

:

so it's not a, not much more of a story

there other than it's doing exactly

667

:

what we expect it to do, and it's,

it's, tracking the indices quite well.

668

:

But sadly, for that quarter, the

gains from the S&P 500 were more

669

:

than offset by the losses of the

stack, so we're down around two

670

:

percent for the quarter, or 1.55

671

:

when you look at the NAV.

672

:

You can see here bit gold down

fourteen percent, Bitcoin down twelve.

673

:

Risk-adjusted, Bitcoin did,

obviously better if we were

674

:

to match the volatilities.

675

:

So that was an easy one.

676

:

so- That's, that's the

the quarterly report.

677

:

let's go ahead and, you know, before

we open it up for questions, I do

678

:

want-- I think we're talking about a

great analogy as to what we're trying

679

:

to do here with the Return Stack ETFs.

680

:

what we've seen, obviously, is

that there are a few favorites.

681

:

I think we came to market and really went

after a market of advisors that had been

682

:

pitched diversification for decades, but

every time they tried it, they got burnt.

683

:

And that diversifier that, that they've

heard the pitch for for 20-plus years,

684

:

I, I certainly heard it when I was,

when I started in the business in the

685

:

early noughts, where trend following was

the clear winner of, as a diversifying

686

:

asset class that really had, like, zero

correlation to equities, and, you would

687

:

see charts of managed futures trend

match with S&P 500, and if you put them

688

:

together, they're, they're pretty good.

689

:

And, and then you bought it, and you had

to, to sell your S&P 500 to buy this weird

690

:

thing, and the weird thing did flat for

three years as S&P 500 ended up, did 20%.

691

:

You, you just got sick of it.

692

:

So three years later, you

get pitched at it again, you

693

:

try it again, you get burned.

694

:

So it's been a couple decades where

advisors have been pitched trend

695

:

following, gotten burned, and I think

the r- the magic of, the Return Stack

696

:

concept is that we're able to blend

those and allow for diversification

697

:

without a lot of sacrifice from your

core stock and bond allocations.

698

:

And because it's blended in a single line

item, it's, it's masked from a lot of

699

:

pain of pointing to that particular asset

class and saying, "Hey, I want that."

700

:

But because they've been pitched trend

following for 20 years We got a, one

701

:

of our, our biggest ETF is RSST, right?

702

:

It, it, it's obvious.

703

:

Nobody really had been pitched

a lot of-- Nobody's pitched-- I,

704

:

I haven't seen a carry strategy

before, managed futures carry.

705

:

gold has always been a weird one because

it, it's a diversifier that nobody

706

:

really understands, so it falls in the

same category of people knowing gold

707

:

but not being able to allocate to it.

708

:

And then, of course,

Bitcoin is a small weight.

709

:

All of these are kind of becoming

more popular, but as a diversifier,

710

:

especially if they're stacked.

711

:

But I think the whole purpose of this

is not to say that, "Hey, one of our

712

:

stacks is better than the other."

713

:

What we want you guys to take away is

if you don't have perfect foresight,

714

:

if you don't have, a crystal ball

and you're bought into this concept

715

:

of return stacking and portable

alpha, and you're questioning

716

:

like, "What should my stack be?"

717

:

I think we would encourage

you to diversify your

718

:

diversifiers as much as you can.

719

:

And I know we're talking about an

analogy, especially when people

720

:

look at, managed futures trend

and, the futures yield strategies.

721

:

They see the same universe and we're

attacking it from different angles.

722

:

it's tough for them to say, "Well,

if you put them together, aren't

723

:

we gonna get a zero return?"

724

:

you were, you had, you were

in a couple podcasts this week

725

:

and had a pretty neat analogy.

726

:

Why don't we go through that to

see if we can kind of crystallize

727

:

the concept here a little bit?

728

:

Adam Butler: Yeah.

729

:

Well, it sort of resurrected a metaphor

that we, I remember we used to use

730

:

quite a bit, a few years ago, and

I think it just is so apropos here.

731

:

But the idea is you guys may be

familiar or have seen the picture

732

:

of the black hole that, was making

the rounds a few years ago, right?

733

:

And you may remember that that, that

image was constructed using a, a coalition

734

:

of telescopes that collectively they

called the Event Horizon Telescope.

735

:

but they were spread out

all over the world, okay?

736

:

So they were s- s- in some cases,

several thousand, kilometers apart.

737

:

Each individual telescope often had

dozens or sometimes hundreds of these,

738

:

dishes pointed at the sky, right?

739

:

they were measuring the, or observing

the event in a wide variety of the

740

:

electromagnetic spectrum, right?

741

:

From sort of X-rays up to

ultraviolet, infrared, et cetera.

742

:

and if you were to just take one

telescope's view at one spectrum of

743

:

the infrared, o- one, part of the

infrared, the electromagnetic spectrum,

744

:

to view the black hole, y- it would

not look at all like a black hole.

745

:

It would look…

746

:

It would have zero resolution.

747

:

It would look terrible, right?

748

:

It was only by virtue of viewing this

object from so many different perspectives

749

:

that you were allowed to have this, this

resolution of information that allowed

750

:

us to construct this amazing image.

751

:

Now, let's look at what

trend and carry are doing.

752

:

Trend is kind of looking in the back, in

the rear view mirror at what the markets

753

:

have done and expecting that to continue.

754

:

And historically, that's

been a good strategy, okay?

755

:

No question.

756

:

But it's just one source of information

Carry is looking at a completely

757

:

different source of information.

758

:

It's what is-- how is the front

month currently relative to the other

759

:

liquid back-month contracts, okay?

760

:

What's the slope of that

futures term structure?

761

:

What does that tell us about current

supply-demand dynamics, okay?

762

:

Those are completely different views

on the same object, and the magic is

763

:

in the resolution of con- of combining

the trend views and the carry views.

764

:

And you see that obviously in the low

correlation between the carry strategy

765

:

returns and the trend strategy returns,

which we've observed s- in live trading

766

:

since inception, but we also see

over very long time horizons, and in

767

:

how they have responded to different

shocks, different market shocks.

768

:

About half the time, trend rises

to the occasion during a market

769

:

shock, but it doesn't always work.

770

:

And about half the time, carry rises to

the occasion, but it doesn't always work.

771

:

When you combine them in a portfolio,

now you've got a pretty decent

772

:

chance that one or the other is

gonna be activated in the right way

773

:

during the next market shock, right?

774

:

So there's just so many different

reasons why you wanna own both of

775

:

them in the portfolio rather than

just sticking with the one you know.

776

:

And I recognize that, that there's

a little discomfort with carry.

777

:

It's a little harder to wrap your head

around, but that's why we are here.

778

:

You know, it's why we spend so much time

trying to write articles and reports.

779

:

We get on…

780

:

Corey was just on, not so long ago

with a, a webinar on trend and carry.

781

:

Spent a lot of time

continuing to build intuition.

782

:

and that's why the sales team is

here and why we're here to help

783

:

build intuition for these strategies.

784

:

So it is worth getting over the hump.

785

:

help us help you.

786

:

We are here to help and, and,

and I think it'll make a big

787

:

difference for you and your clients

788

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: Yeah.

789

:

And on that note, we are continuing

to push out tools and, and

790

:

articles that'll help you along.

791

:

So if you go to the Return Stacked

ETFs website and you hover over

792

:

the tools header, you'll note that

there is an optimize your stack mix.

793

:

There's a couple of other visualizer

tools that allow you to kind of mix

794

:

and match the kind of allocations

to-- for you to see for yourself,

795

:

whether these make sense and, you know,

what you feel more comfortable in.

796

:

What do you believe in more than,

you know, if you don't believe in

797

:

gold and Bitcoin, you try just carry.

798

:

And you'll, you get a, you

get a sense for all of that.

799

:

And we just launched, the advisor

portal, completely revamped.

800

:

We're gonna add to it.

801

:

So if you're an advisor out there

and you go to, to the, uh, tools,

802

:

the advanced tools section, you'll

be able to register, log in.

803

:

We'll, we'll have to review your

application to make sure that

804

:

you're a financial professional.

805

:

But, you'll then get access to,

to these advanced tools and model

806

:

portfolios that'll help you really,

really understand on your own.

807

:

And then you can save portfolios, you

can download PDF versions of what you've

808

:

looked at, and, and a few more tools

are coming down the pipe in the next

809

:

couple of weeks as well that that'll

help, like retirement tools and, you

810

:

know, build your own stack type of

tools where you can upload your own

811

:

portfolio and, and then see what you

can jig around in order to, to add more,

812

:

to add Return Stacked ETFs, what that

would look like, et cetera, et cetera.

813

:

So this is brand new.

814

:

If you're an advisor still listening

here, I would urge you to sign up.

815

:

and again, it's on-- Just go to

the tools, in Return Stacked ETFs,

816

:

and you'll be able to get there.

817

:

we've also published a

f- a couple new pieces.

818

:

Again, I emphasize go to,

to the literature page,

819

:

returnstackedetfs.com/literature,

820

:

and take a look at the latest

articles, especially the start here

821

:

articles, if you're st-still kind of

wrapping your head around the concept.

822

:

And ultimately, look, we're here to help.

823

:

We have a large team of really good

professionals and, and portfolio

824

:

specialists that can just help you,

like, look at the portfolio, see

825

:

where we can find small wins, and

help you build something, help you

826

:

start crawling into the Return Stack

concept, and then we, we can think about

827

:

walking and running at a later time.

828

:

so yes, that's-- I just-- You know,

those are brand new things, that, that'll

829

:

really get you along and do reach out.

830

:

And again, the last, the ultimate thing

we want people to realize is that it's

831

:

just about diversification, right?

832

:

We're not, we, we're not really

pitching one over the other.

833

:

We don't have favorite stacks.

834

:

we just want to add

diversifiers to the community.

835

:

And if you don't like the r-diversifiers

we have, that's where we have the

836

:

100% global equity, 100% bond, when

you can choose your own adventure.

837

:

And look out for articles on

that as well in ways that you

838

:

can use that in creative ways.

839

:

Um,

840

:

Adam Butler: answer this

question, I think, right?

841

:

Someo- someone asked about trade

netting opportunities between

842

:

trend and carry strategies.

843

:

And, I mean, look, it's a wonderful

question, and it, it ends up

844

:

being a bit of a trade-off.

845

:

I think, our experience is that many

advisors like the opportunity to be able

846

:

to mix and match and, and add the right

amount of trend and carry and other

847

:

alternatives to the portfolio without

being kind of forced to hold equal risk

848

:

in, in trend and carry, and I guess in

other potential diversifying factors.

849

:

and, I mean, if you do combine them in

a fund, the fact that they get their

850

:

signals from different, from different

sources of information means that they

851

:

are sometimes trading against one another.

852

:

And if you do that in the same portfolio,

obviously if, if one strategy is saying

853

:

you wanna buy a new contract in a

market and the other is saying you'd

854

:

wanna sell another contract in the

market, you just don't trade that day.

855

:

And so you do trade…

856

:

You do save on, on trading costs, right?

857

:

so yeah, there's trend netting if

you, if you run them both in a fund

858

:

like we do in SMAs and like we do in,

in our mutual funds and hedge funds.

859

:

But then you give up the flexibility,

that you get with running them in

860

:

individual strategies like in the

return stacked ETFs, where you get

861

:

to control how much exposure you

want to allocate to one or the other.

862

:

So I

863

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: Transparency ends

up being, as we know, we've gotten

864

:

a lot of love for our transparency.

865

:

You- we've shown you our, our website

and the kind of the widgets in order

866

:

to show you w- how carry is measured

and how transition plots work and,

867

:

and trend and carry and, you know.

868

:

Transparency goes a long way

in people being able to s-

869

:

hang in there for the long run.

870

:

And so it's a trade-off between behavioral

success and then, you know, edging out

871

:

some benefits on the trade netting.

872

:

what's another question here?

873

:

so h-

874

:

Adam Butler: much in the way

of, of hidden financing costs

875

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: Yeah.

876

:

Well, let's a- let's ask a question first.

877

:

So let's show everybody

what the question is.

878

:

s- struggle to understand the differences

in hidden financing costs spread for

879

:

rolling futures between RSST and RSBT.

880

:

Where can I find more

information on those?

881

:

All right.

882

:

So Adam, you were saying?

883

:

Adam Butler: Yeah.

884

:

I, so I mean, the, the bulk of both of

those funds is the beta is invested in,

885

:

you know, c- a cash equity ETF, right?

886

:

and then there's a, a sleeve of, call

it 20, 25% that is invested in, in

887

:

futures because we need to also free up

capital to invest to collateralize the

888

:

managed futures stack overlays, right?

889

:

so call it 75% is just like being invested

in, in the lowest cost, or we try to keep

890

:

it to the lowest cost cash-based ETF.

891

:

so the only financing cost is

in the futures, portion of it.

892

:

And yeah, I mean, the, the, the funding

cost will be a little bit different.

893

:

Right now, for example, the

funding cost in S&P 500 index

894

:

futures is higher than average.

895

:

the same is not true for Treasury futures.

896

:

So the, the funding cost will be a

little bit different from time to time,

897

:

depending on the funding markets really.

898

:

over time, we don't expect that

to have a, a super meaningful

899

:

impact on, on, on the portfolios.

900

:

And, and if we look back through time and

we measure that, certainly the benefits

901

:

you get from, from being able to stack the

diversifiers have dramatically overwhelmed

902

:

whatever the, the variation in funding

costs might be on that sliver that we

903

:

use futures for instead of, of cash.

904

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: Yeah.

905

:

So we're not using-- we're not

funding our equity allocation

906

:

with 100% futures contracts.

907

:

We're not funding 100% of

RSBT with treasury futures.

908

:

We are getting as much as we can from cash

securities, so you're gonna get exactly

909

:

what those cash securities provide.

910

:

Invest the rest in T-bills, and then

whatever collateral we need to fund

911

:

those futures contracts will go in.

912

:

Yes, recently the funding costs

in the S&P 500 has been higher.

913

:

That, that vacillates,

that goes, high and low.

914

:

So over long periods of time, we're

looking at, you know, 10, 10 to 40

915

:

basis points in moving up and down for

the financing costs on average, right?

916

:

You'll have times where th-

there'll be momentary, increases

917

:

in that and decreases, but on

average, that's what you get.

918

:

three minutes left.

919

:

I wanna remind everybody

of one last thing.

920

:

We have the symposium, the Return

Stack Symposium coming up in October.

921

:

If you don't know about that,

last year was a fantastic success.

922

:

We had incredible speakers.

923

:

We had the, the CIO of Delta Pension

Plans talking about how he brought

924

:

an under, funded, pension plan,

significantly underfunded pension

925

:

plan, like, I think underfunded by

60%, to funded by a combination of

926

:

working with Delta Airlines and doing

portable alpha and return stacking.

927

:

This year, if you go to our website

and, and go to Insights and then

928

:

Events, you will see the-- I'll

share my screen just quickly.

929

:

you will see that the

event is a stacked lineup.

930

:

We're starting it off with Cliff Asness

of the-- of AQR, who of course, has

931

:

been doing this and talking about this,

putting his money where his mouth is

932

:

since the beginning of his career.

933

:

but it, you know, it has been-- It

was such a great event last year.

934

:

Our speakers are also, you know,

we got it from, uh, allocators from

935

:

Memco, JP Morgan, Man Investments, AQR.

936

:

And we're gonna be walking through a

combination of like how the institution's

937

:

doing and why it works, and then how you

bring it down to a level of the advisory

938

:

space and how we implement and we help

advisors really simplify and implement

939

:

in that crawl, walk, run, framework.

940

:

So go to returnstacked.com,

941

:

go to Insights and Events, or you

can do /return-stacking-symposium.

942

:

We gotta get better at these

URL naming conventions.

943

:

And, and register.

944

:

You can go all the way, reserve

your seat here at the bottom

945

:

and put in your information.

946

:

We will review your application

and, And we will let you know.

947

:

That is on October 28th in

Chicago's, s- old main post office.

948

:

It's a beautiful space.

949

:

lots of stuff to do in Chicago.

950

:

There's also blocks, hotel

blocks available, and that's

951

:

first come, first serve.

952

:

So please do make your

way there, examine it.

953

:

I promise you it'll be worth your time

if you can, if you can head out to

954

:

Chicago for a quick, one-day event.

955

:

All right

956

:

Adam Butler: It's a lot of fun, and

we're at, right at the hour, Rodrigo.

957

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: And, and you're gonna

get to meet the whole Return Stack team.

958

:

Every single one of us is gonna be

there, so, you know, we'll, we'll be

959

:

able to answer all of your questions

live and in person All right.

960

:

Thanks everybody.

961

:

Thank you, Adam

962

:

Adam Butler: Thank you, sir.

963

:

Well done.

964

:

Thanks, guys.

965

:

See you next time

About the Podcast

Show artwork for Get Stacked Investment Podcast
Get Stacked Investment Podcast

Listen for free

About your hosts

Profile picture for Rodrigo Gordillo

Rodrigo Gordillo

Rodrigo Gordillo is the President and Portfolio Manager at ReSolve Asset Management Global, an alternative asset management firm specializing in globally diversified systematic investment strategies. He co-founded ReSolve Asset Management Inc. in 2015 and expanded to ReSolve Asset Management Global in 2021. Starting his career at John Hancock focusing on pensions, Gordillo transitioned to the ultra-high-net-worth sector with i3 Advisors Inc. He held significant roles at Macquarie Private Wealth, Dundee Goodman Private Wealth, and Richardson GMP, enhancing his expertise in investment decisions and client wealth management.
Profile picture for Corey Hoffstein

Corey Hoffstein

Corey Hoffstein is the CEO and Chief Investment Officer of Newfound Research, a quantitative investment and research firm based in the Greater Tampa Bay Area, United States. Hoffstein co-founded Newfound Research with the aim of assisting investors in proactively managing investment risks through diversification, specifically by leveraging Return Stacking™ strategies. The firm specializes in managing alternative strategies and capital-efficient solutions, enabling the implementation of these innovative investment concepts. In addition to his role at Newfound Research, Hoffstein also serves as a Portfolio Manager at Return Stacked® Portfolio Solutions.